Thuggee, marginality and the state effect in colonial India, circa 1770–1840

Tom Lloyd
Additional contact information
Tom Lloyd: Tom Lloyd is at University of Edinburgh

The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 2008, vol. 45, issue 2, 201-237

Abstract: This essay explores the way that the ‘effect’ of a colonial state was achieved in India in the course of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It does so by scrutinizing the East India Company's initiatives against what political, military and judicial officers termed ‘extraordinary’ crime; beginning with Warren Hastings’ attempts to tackle dacoity in late eighteenth-century Bengal and culminating with William Sleeman's notorious campaign to suppress ‘thuggee’ in the early-mid nineteenth-century, this essay surveys similarly extraordinary initiatives that were at first experimented with but gradually normalised in the course of British pursuit of bandits. An engagement with the recent work of Giorgio Agamben underpins the attempt to offer significant revisions to both the extant historiography on ‘thuggee’ and, more broadly, the idea of such a coherent, free-standing entity as the ‘colonial state’—as an abstracted force directing India social, economic, cultural and political life. Intrinsic to this attempt is the problematization of the elaboration and operation of government sovereignty in early colonial India.

Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001946460804500202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indeco:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:201-237

DOI: 10.1177/001946460804500202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Indian Economic & Social History Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().