The Shifting Shape of the Rape Discourse

Neetika Vishwanath

Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2018, vol. 25, issue 1, 1-25

Abstract: This article reports findings based on non-participant observation during eight weeks of rape trials in a Fast Track Court (FTC) in Lucknow, established exclusively to hold trials of cases involving ‘crimes against women’. Research methods included an in-depth study of 15 ‘disposed off’ case files, in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with 12 lawyers and focus group discussions (FGDs) with police officials held at 15 police stations in Lucknow district. Around 50 per cent of the rape trials were found to be related to the offence of statutory rape in cases of runaway marriages of minors. Another distinct category of cases that came to trial as rape cases were those involving ‘breaking of or false promise of marriage’. This article problematises and contests the construction of these categories of cases as ‘rape’ and argues that it points to a shift and hijack of the rape discourse by patriarchal familial and legal forces.

Keywords: Rape; court-room ethnography; 16 December Delhi gang-rape case; Nirbhaya; Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013; Lucknow; Sessions Court; use of rape law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521517738447 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indgen:v:25:y:2018:i:1:p:1-25

DOI: 10.1177/0971521517738447

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Indian Journal of Gender Studies from Centre for Women's Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().