Korea's Trade Intensity with Her Major Trading Countries in the Manufacturing Sector: Its Changes over the Last Decade*
Seung Jin Kim
International Area Studies Review, 2007, vol. 10, issue 1, 151-174
Abstract:
It was found that Korea's trade intensity with the USA decreased from 2.87 in 1993 to 2.39 in 2004 due to decrease in Korea's special country bias with the USA from 3.06 in 1993 to 2.26 in 2004 even if Korea's trade complementarity with the USA increased from 0.94 in 1993 to 1.06 in 2004. Therefore Korea's special country bias with the USA should be enhanced by increasing capital movements and reducing discriminatory tariffs and other import restrictions between Korea and the USA. Korea's trade intensity with Japan was found to have decreased from 8.37 in 1993 to 8.11 in 2004 due to decrease in Korea's trade complementarity with Japan from 1.05 in 1993 to 0.88 in 2004 even if Korea's special country bias with Japan increased from 7.95 in 1993 to 9.20 in 2004. Therefore Korea's special country bias with Japan should be enhanced further by increasing capital movements and reducing discriminatory tariffs and other import restrictions between Korea and Japan. It was also found that Korea's trade intensity with China increased from 5.96 in 1993 to 10.39 in 2004 due to (a) increase in Korea's special country bias with China from 6.99 in 1993 to 9.58 in 2004 and (b) increase in Korea's trade complementarity with China from 0.85 in 1993 to 1.08 in 2004. Therefore Korea's special country bias with China should be enhanced further by increasing capital movements and reducing discriminatory tariffs and other import restrictions between Korea and China.
Keywords: Trade Intensity; Trade Complementarity; Special Country Bias; Gravity Model; Trade Intensity Index Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590701000109 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:intare:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:151-174
DOI: 10.1177/223386590701000109
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Area Studies Review from Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().