EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Justice, Morality, and International Relations: A Critical–Theoretical Reading

Abhishek Choudhary

Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 2018, vol. 22, issue 1, 22-38

Abstract: The article argues in favor of the concept of justice as a foundational norm of global politics. It looks at the puzzle that why order is preferred over justice. The disregard toward justice is seen as a tool of convenience for fulfilling hegemonic aspirations and avoiding any normative commitment. The order versus justice debate has been in the discipline for long, where different theoretical tradition has offered differing preferences. The article takes a critical–theoretical viewpoint and argues for a more active involvement with the notion of justice to have a humane understanding of international politics. It challenges the cosmopolitan idea of global justice as being a mere reflection of hegemony. The theories of justice rooted in liberalism end up providing another set of meta-narrative. The prescription, thus, is against the creation of a world government. Instead, it argues for installing an ethical and emancipatory dimension to the project.

Keywords: Cosmopolitanism; critical theory; discourse ethics; hegemony; justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973598418757818 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jadint:v:22:y:2018:i:1:p:22-38

DOI: 10.1177/0973598418757818

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Jadavpur Journal of International Relations
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:jadint:v:22:y:2018:i:1:p:22-38