‘Buyer Beware’: A Case Study of How to Assess the Reliability of Policy Advice

Adam Fforde

Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 2025, vol. 10, issue 2, 105-119

Abstract: This article supports the assessment of policy advice prompted by the ‘servicisation’ issue. Advice to developing countries has long advocated industrialisation. However, structural change since the end of the Cold War has been servicisation, not industrialisation. This, and the lack of work on servicisation with many studies supporting industrialisation, show confirmation bias and problems managing anomalies. Shifts towards policies stressing services exist but are rare. Those using policy advice therefore need ways to manage such issues. This article shows how policy assessment can be done, partly by monitoring gaps between experienced realities and advocated policies, and partly through examination vulnerability to confirmation bias. Here, the latter stems from the standard analytical framework’s use of production functions that relies empirically upon the assumption that constant price sectoral GDP measures ‘output’, but it does not. Assessment of policy can also search for lack of attention by researchers to confirmation bias.

Keywords: NIA; production functions; methodology; mainstream economics; structural change; servicisation; industrialisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/24551333251314579 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jodepp:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:105-119

DOI: 10.1177/24551333251314579

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Development Policy and Practice
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().