Towards Methodological Rigour in the Study of the Family: Problems and Prospects

Premilla D'Cruz and Shalini Bharat
Additional contact information
Premilla D'Cruz: Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India
Shalini Bharat: Unit for Family Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

Psychology and Developing Societies, 2001, vol. 13, issue 1, 71-91

Abstract: The multidisciplinary knowledge base that contributes to our understanding of the family does not facilitate methodological rigour. This is so because the methodology of the contributing disciplines does not always do justice to the unique features of the family, leading to a lack of "methodological understanding" (Brown & Kidwell, 1982: 852). Recognising the need to develop an independent methodology to study the family, experts in the field have put forward various alternatives. While many of these alternatives are neither new nor flawless, their proponents believe that they are the better methods that family researchers should adopt when conducting research on the family. This article discusses methodological shortcomings that are commonly found in the study of the family, highlighting the need for and the relevance of addressing them. Methodological alternatives are then described and critiqued, and suggestions for enhancing their sharpness advanced.

Date: 2001
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133360101300104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:psydev:v:13:y:2001:i:1:p:71-91

DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Psychology and Developing Societies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().