Patterns of Exclusion of Personal Property From American Property Tax Systems

John Mikesell

Public Finance Review, 1992, vol. 20, issue 4, 528-542

Abstract: Selective and general exclusions, along with assessment practices, have made the personal property share of the general property tax base now smaller than at any time since the assumption of homogeneity emerged in the early 19th century. Of the types of tangible and intangible personal property, only business depreciable fixed assets remain taxable in a majority of states. Evidence indicates that removing personal property from the base, rather than crippling fiscal capacity, permits higher property taxation possibly because governments feel less constrained by interstate competition after extracting a physically mobile element from the base, possibly because an inequity has been removed (arguments for personal property taxation being less clear than for real property), or possibly because businesses become less vigilant when this property is excluded. Because uniform taxation of all real and personal property may have significant logical and practical problems leading to personal property exclusion, separate state taxation of such property may be appropriate .

Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114219202000409 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:20:y:1992:i:4:p:528-542

DOI: 10.1177/109114219202000409

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().