 Risk assessment of fuel quantity indicator replacement in ATR 72 aircraftRosario M Ardito Marretta and John A Drew Bedson Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2015, vol. 229, issue 6, 587-603 Abstract: Aircraft maintenance activities are rife with opportunities for error. The concurrent in-flight failure of all of the engines of a non-scheduled airline flight and the following list of human lives highlight one of these opportunities. As commonly recognized among flight operators, each flight safety agency follows the criteria of the International Civil Aviation Organization Annex 16 in which all the evidences of the technical investigation pave the way for avoiding future flight accidents or incidents. On the other hand, when the Italian penal procedure code was applied for the Tuninter aircraft ATR 72 (identification code TS-LBB) crash at issue on 6 August 2005 near Palermo (Italy), the investigation is also carried out for finding (if concurrent or not) the personal and professional responsibilities. This was the task of the first author (R.M.A.M.). Now, this article briefly reports the findings of the investigation and discusses more in detail how both human factors of design and human factors in the published instructions for the completion of a maintenance task contributed to this accident. Keywords: Aeronautical risk; aeronautical system reliability; aeronautical system safety; aerospace maintenance; human reliability (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:risrel:v:229:y:2015:i:6:p:587-603 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Risk and Reliability |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.