Discharges of Patients from Public Psychiatric Hospitals in Italy between 1994 and 2000

Barbara D'Avanzo, Angelo Barbato, Corrado Barbui, R. Nadia Battino, Graziella Civenti and Lucilla Frattura
Additional contact information
Barbara D'Avanzo: Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, `Mario Negri' Institute, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milan, Italy. barbara@marionegri.itLaboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.
Angelo Barbato: Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.
Corrado Barbui: Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.
R. Nadia Battino: Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.
Graziella Civenti: Regione Lombardia, Assessorato alla Sanità , Milan, Italy.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2003, vol. 49, issue 1, 27-34

Abstract: Background: Psychiatric hospitals in Italy had to be closed under a law dated 1994. Aims: To investigate the discharge of patients from public psychiatric hospitals. Methods: A total of 4492 patients from 22 psychiatric hospitals were described at recruitment and followed during the period 1994-2000. Their characteristics were investigated as determinants of discharge to community residential facilities for psychiatric patients versus other settings. Results: All 22 psychiatric hospitals closed between 1994 and 2000; 678 patients had died, and the remainder were discharged. Of these, 39% went to nursing homes, 29% to community residential facilities for psychiatric patients, 2% joined their family, less than 1% were settled in private independent accommodation, and 29% remained in the psychiatric hospital, although defined as discharged. Ten patients were recorded as missing when still in the psychiatric hospitals, none after discharge. Younger, more educated patients and patients from two of the four regions studied were more likely to be discharged to community residential facilities. Conclusions: The majority of patients were discharged to highly supervised settings. The potential risk of abandonment due to deinstitutionalization was not observed in this population. The wide use of highly supervised settings can be explained by the patients' old age, but different local policies may have affected the discharge process.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076400304900104 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:49:y:2003:i:1:p:27-34

DOI: 10.1177/002076400304900104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().