A Qualitative Study of Patients' Perceptions of a ‘Minimal’ Psychological Therapy
Wendy Macdonald,
Nicola Mead,
Peter Bower,
David Richards and
Karina Lovell
Additional contact information
Wendy Macdonald: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; wendy.macdonald@man.ac.uk
Peter Bower: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK
David Richards: Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
Karina Lovell: Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, University of Manchester, UK
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2007, vol. 53, issue 1, 23-35
Abstract:
Background : Access to psychological therapy is often difficult. Problems with access may be overcome through ‘minimal interventions’ (such as books and computer programs), which encourage self-help for mental health problems and are less dependent on the availability of specialist therapists. However, to be effective, such interventions must be acceptable to patients. Aims : To use qualitative methods to explore patient attitudes, by examining patient expectancies of psychological therapy and their experiences with a ‘minimal intervention’ (guided self-help). Methods : Qualitative interviews ( N = 24) were conducted with patients after they had received guided self-help for depression as part of a randomised controlled trial. Results : There were important gaps between patients' expectancies of psychological therapy and their experience of the guided self-help. These gaps related to the process of therapy (e.g. time, professional expertise) and outcomes. Particularly salient was a theme relating to explanatory models. Patients were often seeking insight into the ‘cause’ of their current difficulties, whereas the minimal intervention was largely focused on symptom resolution. Conclusions : The effective implementation of ‘minimal interventions’ requires an understanding of the expectancies of patients concerning psychological therapy, in order to provide a basis for effective communication and negotiation between professionals and patients.
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764006066841 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:1:p:23-35
DOI: 10.1177/0020764006066841
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().