The Mental Health Expert Patient: Findings from a Pilot Study of a Generic Chronic Condition Self-Management Programme for People with Mental Illness
Sharon Lawn,
Malcolm W. Battersby,
Rene G. Pols,
John Lawrence,
Trevor Parry and
Mick Urukalo
Additional contact information
Sharon Lawn: Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Room 4T306, Margaret Tobin Centre, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. Sharon.lawn@flinders.edu.au
Rene G. Pols: Flinders University Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
John Lawrence: Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
Trevor Parry: Division of Mental Health/Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
Mick Urukalo: Department of Health, South Australia
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2007, vol. 53, issue 1, 63-74
Abstract:
Background : Less than optimal outcomes and escalating costs for chronic conditions including mental illness have prompted calls for innovative approaches to chronic illness management. Aims : This study aimed to test the feasibility and utility of combining a generic, clinician administered and peer-led self-management group approach for people with serious mental illness. Method : General practitioners and mental health case managers used a patient centred care model (the Flinders model) to assist 38 patients with serious mental illness to identify their self-management needs, and match these with interventions including Stanford peer-led, self-management groups and one-to-one peer support. Self-management and quality of life outcomes were measured and qualitative evaluation elicited feedback from all participants. Results : Collaborative care planning, combined with a problems and goals focused approach, resulted in improved self-management and mental functioning at 3 to 6 months follow-up. The Stanford self-management course was applicable and acceptable to patients with serious mental illnesses. Qualitative feedback was highly supportive of this approach. Conclusions : Generic, structured assessment and care planning approaches, resulting in self-management education targeted to the individual, improved self-management and quality of life. Patients and service providers reported considerable gains despite the challenges associated with introducing a generic model within the mental health and general practice sector.
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764007075010 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:1:p:63-74
DOI: 10.1177/0020764007075010
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().