The Quantification of Violence Scale: a Simple Method of Recording Significant Violence

Peter Tyrer, Sylvia Cooper, Elizabeth Herbert, Conor Duggan, Mike Crawford, Eileen Joyce, Deborah Rutter, Helen Seivewright, Sandra O'Sullivan, Bharti Rao, Domenic Cicchetti and Tony Maden
Additional contact information
Peter Tyrer: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London, p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk
Sylvia Cooper: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Elizabeth Herbert: Imperial College Medical School, Exhibition Road, London
Conor Duggan: Department of Forensic Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
Mike Crawford: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Eileen Joyce: Institute of Neurology, University College London, Box 19, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London
Deborah Rutter: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Helen Seivewright: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Sandra O'Sullivan: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Bharti Rao: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Domenic Cicchetti: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London
Tony Maden: Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), London

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2007, vol. 53, issue 6, 485-497

Abstract: Background: Although there are many rating scales recording the incidence and intensity of violence there are none that are specifically concerned with the measurement and assessment of severe violence. Aims: To develop a scale sensitive to variation centred on severe violence, establish its normative values, test its feasibility, and assess its reliability and validity in different populations. Method: The Quantification of Violence Scale (QOVS) was developed in two stages. First, a list of 30 commonly eXperienced violent episodes in clinical psychiatric practice were evaluated and tested by weighting each episode by severity. Second, a numerical scale used to record the severity of the episode according to its degree of planning, intent and consequences. Violent episodes in two clinical populations were compared using the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) and the preliminary version of the QOVS over periods up to 18 months, following which the numerical scale was developed. Results: Good (0.60—0.74) to EXcellent (> 0.75) test—retest and inter-rater reliability agreement was obtained with both forms of the scale (intra-class correlations of 0.75 and 0.69 respectively), and similar agreement with MOAS scores was reached (0.67) in clinical populations. The scale was quick and easy to use in practice, and a score defining severe violence (9 on the numerical scale and 16 on the matched scale) was determined. Conclusions: The QOVS, in its two forms, is a useful measure of recording significant violence in clinical and forensic practice.

Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764007083870 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:6:p:485-497

DOI: 10.1177/0020764007083870

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().