Mental Health Service Users’ Perceptions and Experiences of Sedation, Seclusion and Restraint

Pat Mayers, Nelleke Keet, Gunter Winkler and Alan J. Flisher
Additional contact information
Pat Mayers: Division of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa, Pat.Mayers@uct.ac.za
Nelleke Keet: Department of Social Work, Huguenot College, Wellington, South Africa
Gunter Winkler: Provincial Government of the Western Cape, South Africa
Alan J. Flisher: Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Adolescent Health Research Institute, University of Cape Town, and Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Bergen, Norway

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2010, vol. 56, issue 1, 60-73

Abstract: Background: Sedation, seclusion or restraint are recognized methods of containing a person experiencing an acute psychotic episode with behavioural disturbance which has not responded to verbal or non-sedating pharmacological interventions. These interventions pose significant ethical and practical challenges to service providers who are responsible for safeguarding the human rights of mental health service users. Aims: In a collaborative two-phase study between mental health care providers and mental health service users, the perceptions and experiences of a group of service users who have been exposed to sedation, seclusion and restraint were explored. Method: A focus group was conducted with eight service users. The content of the focus group was transcribed and themes were identified using thematic analysis. These were presented to a second focus group consisting of eight other service users for validation and comment. Based on the results of the focus groups, a questionnaire was developed and administered to a convenience sample of 43 service users in three localities. Results: Service users reported inadequate communication between them and service providers and perceived that their human rights had been infringed during acute episodes of illness. Methods of containment were often seen as punitive rather than therapeutic. Sedation was most frequently used and was considered to be least distressing. Observing methods of forced/involuntary containment caused further distress. Conclusions: There is a need to humanize service users’ experiences during episodes of acute illness. Measures should include prevention of human rights abuses; minimization of isolation and distress; improvement of communication between service providers and service users; and promotion of attitudinal changes which reflect respect for other people’s dignity.

Keywords: human rights; mental health service users; seclusion; sedation; restraint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008098293 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:1:p:60-73

DOI: 10.1177/0020764008098293

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().