Social Housing Reforms in England and Wales: A Public Choice Evaluation

George A. Boyne and Richard M. Walker
Additional contact information
George A. Boyne: Public Services Research Unit, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, CF10 3EU, UK, Boyne@cf.ac.uk
Richard M. Walker: Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, CF10 3WA, UK, Walkerrm@cf.ac.uk

Urban Studies, 1999, vol. 36, issue 13, 2237-2262

Abstract: Public choice theory provides three main principles for the management of social housing: market structures should be competitive; organisations should be compelled to produce information on their efficiency and effectiveness; and large agencies should be disaggregated into smaller units. Social housing reforms in England and Wales have largely reflected these principles. However, it is difficult to establish the impact of public choice policies because data on housing performance are incomplete. Furthermore, the effects of housing reforms are clouded by a range of social and economic changes in the context of housing management. Nevertheless, the available evidence suggests that public choice principles have had contradictory effects: efficiency and responsiveness have improved, but equity has deteriorated. Thus judgements on public choice theory depend on the weight attached to these different dimensions of performance.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098992403 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:36:y:1999:i:13:p:2237-2262

DOI: 10.1080/0042098992403

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().