Globalisation, Regions and the State: Exploring the Limitations of Economic Modernisation through Inward Investment

Nicholas Phelps and Mark Tewdwr-Jones
Additional contact information
Mark Tewdwr-Jones: Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WCIHOQB, UK, m.tewdwr-jones@ucl.ac.uk

Urban Studies, 2001, vol. 38, issue 8, 1253-1272

Abstract: Over the past 10 years or so, the UK has witnessed intense interregional competition for a small number of large inward investment projects. These projects, examples of foreign direct investment (FDI) from Far East Asia, have been relied upon by nation-states as panaceas to the economic problems being experienced within older industrial regions. Central government has adopted a non-interventionist approach to FDI and has rather encouraged regional-level institutions of governance to provide innovative and competitive packages of aid to the prospective investors through the creation of customised spaces. By relying on this FDI, local and regional-level institutions within the UK have sought to reduce or eliminate those uncertainties associated with local governance and the planning system that would otherwise face potential investors. We discuss these issues with reference to three case-study FDI examples: LG in South Wales, Samsung in the North East of England and Hyundai in Scotland. These projects provide good examples of the prestige attached to large FDI projects by regional and local agencies: by-passing normal local democratic processes; instigating streamlined institutional processes; and ignoring environmental protection policies to `land' the projects for particular regions. But the collapse of the south-east Asian economies and the recent mothballing of both the Hyundai and LG plants illustrate some very immediate problems regarding the unsustainability of the nation-state both relying on the global market and subordinating local interstices to resolve regional economic problems. Overall, the paper examines how particular state forms and practices operate to privilege certain types of interests and activities at certain scales, and how particular state entities are attempting to capture agendas and decisions at particular scales of governance.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980120061016 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1253-1272

DOI: 10.1080/00420980120061016

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().