Beyond Polarisation versus Professionalisation? A Case Study of the Development of the Helsinki Region, Finland
Mari Vaattovaara and
Matti Kortteinen
Additional contact information
Mari Vaattovaara: University of Helsinki, 21 Kuninkaistentie, 02160 Espoo, Finland. mari.vaattovaara@helsinki.fi
Matti Kortteinen: STAKES, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, PO Box 220, FIN-00531, Helsinki, Finland. matti.kortteinen@stakes.fi
Urban Studies, 2003, vol. 40, issue 11, 2127-2145
Abstract:
Starting from the polarisation (Sassen) versus professionalisation (Hamnett) discussion, the paper presents an analysis of the development of the Helsinki Metropolitan Region, the capital district of Finland. The analysis of new urban differentiation shows how modern ITC-based 'informational development' (Castells) seriously challenges the egalitarian basis of the Nordic welfare regime. The bimodal urban differentiation is not, however, regarded as a sign of polarisation, but rather as a new phase in economic development linked with a structural shift in the demand for labour that can result in very different outcomes in different cities and welfare regimes. In other words, both polarisation and professionalisation are interpreted as different versions or outcomes of a more fundamental structural shift combining both.
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000123213 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:11:p:2127-2145
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123213
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().