EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Welfare migration or migrant selection? Social insurance participation and rural migrants’ intentions to seek permanent urban settlement in China

Shenghua Xie, Juan Chen, Veli-Matti Ritakallio and Xiangming Leng
Additional contact information
Shenghua Xie: Central China Normal University, China
Juan Chen: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Veli-Matti Ritakallio: University of Turku, Finland
Xiangming Leng: Central China Normal University, China

Urban Studies, 2021, vol. 58, issue 10, 1983-2003

Abstract: The welfare system can be a crucial factor in the urban settlement of rural migrants, but its effects are difficult to determine because to do so one must distinguish the effect of welfare entitlement from the effect of ‘migrant selectivity bias’, which widely exists in cities in developing countries. Using survey data from 15 Chinese cities, this study examines the ways in which social insurance – the most critical social welfare package in China – affects rural migrants’ urban-settlement intentions. The results show that there is a ‘migrant selectivity bias’ in Chinese cities, that is, rural migrants who are better off socio-economically are more inclined to participate in social insurance and are more inclined to pursue permanent urban settlement. Meanwhile, social insurance participation is significantly and positively related to rural migrants’ urban-settlement intentions, and this positive relation remains even after we discount the effect of ‘migrant selectivity bias’ in the analysis. We argue that, for rural migrants in China, the effect of social insurance participation on urban settlement intentions closely resembles that experienced by those who move to migration-managed regimes. We conclude that the Chinese government should establish a more inclusive social welfare system to enable rural migrants to permanently settle in cities.

Keywords: migrant selectivity bias; rural migrant; social insurance; urban settlement intention; welfare migration; 移民选择性å è§; å†œæ ‘ç§»æ°‘; ç¤¾ä¼šä¿ é™©; åŸŽå¸‚å®šå±…æ„ æ„¿; ç¦ åˆ©ç§»æ°‘ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020936153 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:10:p:1983-2003

DOI: 10.1177/0042098020936153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:10:p:1983-2003