Impact of public investment on residential gentrification: Individual-level evidence from Shanghai’s rail transit expansion

Kuang Kuang Deng, Ling Li and Jie Chen
Additional contact information
Kuang Kuang Deng: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, China
Ling Li: Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, China
Jie Chen: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Urban Studies, 2025, vol. 62, issue 11, 2328-2347

Abstract: Increasing concerns have been raised about rail transit acting as a catalyst for gentrification because of mass rail transit investments around the world. The evidence, however, is mixed regarding transit-induced gentrification. This article addresses this issue by examining two key features of gentrification-style neighbourhood change, namely, whether housing costs rise as a result of the opening of new rail stations and whether this has resulted in the displacement of low-income residents. Our method relies on a difference-in-differences model and a unique dataset of individual-level housing rental records collected in Shanghai, China. According to the results, housing rents within 1.8 km from the new station have increased significantly in the year following its opening. In contrast to those living outside the station catchment area, housing renters living inside are more likely to move to locations that are more distant from rail stations, the city centre and their workplace and to be displaced by better educated, older and wealthier newcomers. Rent increases and the exodus of low-income renters together provide further evidence of transit-induced gentrification, which calls for the attention of urban planners and policymakers.

Keywords: gentrification; public investment; rail transit development; residential mobility; 绅士化; 公共投资; è½¨é “äº¤é€šå ‘å±•; å±…ä½ æµ åŠ¨æ€§ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241310366 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:11:p:2328-2347

DOI: 10.1177/00420980241310366

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().