THE METHODOLOGY OF ECONOMICS: AN AGENDA FOR REFORM

Peter Smith

Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 2010, vol. 2, issue 1 (May), 81-108

Abstract: Uniquely among sciences, the methodology of economics (its epistemology, ontology, scope, and focal questions) has failed to improve the match between its theories and reality. It is aprioristic, assuming that introspection will reveal unchallengeable basic truths from which a valid theoretical structure can be logically deduced. Despite the efforts of Mill, von Mises, Robbins, Friedman, Hausman, and others, this remains indefensible: inter alia, the basic ‘truths’ are immune neither to professional/ cultural biases, nor to uncertainty. Reformed methodology is proposed that would take us closer to the other sciences; this includes a new set of central questions that focus on establishing a more realistic set of basic concepts, and the provision of tools for managing complex, dynamic economic pro- blems (e.g., crises, development).

JEL-codes: A10 B10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jare-sh.com/downloads/abstract_may_2010/smith.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shc:jaresh:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:81-108

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Academic Research in Economics is currently edited by Claudiu Chiru

More articles in Journal of Academic Research in Economics from Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Management Constanta Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Chiru ().