The Gendered Landscape of Informal Caregiving: Cohort Effects and Socioeconomic Inequalities in England

Maria Petrillo (), Ricardo Rodrigues (), Matt Bennett () and Gwilym Pryce ()
Additional contact information
Maria Petrillo: ESRC Centre for Care & CIRCLE, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK
Ricardo Rodrigues: ISEG Research, ISEG (Lisbon School of Economics and Management), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Matt Bennett: ESRC Centre for Care & School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, UK
Gwilym Pryce: ESRC Centre for Care & School of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK

No 2025009, Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics

Abstract: We provide the first detailed cohort analysis to investigate both the effect of individual-level poverty and meso-level deprivation on the gender care gap, highlighting how individual circumstances and place shape caregiving provision. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (N =40,324), we apply two complementary approaches: (i) multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression to provide detailed age cohort analysis of the probability of providing informal care by sex, accounting for the nested data structure; and (ii) Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to examine whether the factors that shape the probability of providing care have additive or multiplicative reinforcing effects. Results reveal a clear age pattern in caregiving, peaking between ages 60–70 before declining, with earlier-born cohorts showing higher caregiving likelihood at the same ages compared to later-born cohorts. The gender care gap is most pronounced among middle-born cohorts (1969–1978, 1959–1968, and 1949–1958), particularly between ages 50 and 60. Both poverty and geographic deprivation significantly shape gendered caregiving inequalities: the gender care gap is wider among individuals above the poverty line and in deprived local authority districts. The caregiving likelihood is primarily driven by the independent effects of cohort, gender, poverty, and meso-level deprivation, with limited evidence of multiplicative intersectional effects. These findings demonstrate that the gender care gap is not a uniform phenomenon. Policy attempts to address the gender care gap need to be mindful of these variations, not least because they potentially elucidate the potential sources of gender inequalities in care.

Keywords: Informal caregiving; inequality; age-cohort analysis; MAIHDA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I3 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 58 pages
Date: 2025-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age and nep-eur
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps First version, October 2025 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shf:wpaper:2025009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike Crabtree ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).