The Broadband Stimulus: A Rural Boondoggle and Missed Opportunity

Gregory Rosston () and Scott Wallsten
Additional contact information
Gregory Rosston: Stanford University
Scott Wallsten: Georgetown University

No 13-008, Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included $7 billion for broadband development. We highlight two endemic problems with the rural subsidy programs managed by NTIA: 1) There is little economic rationale for subsidizing rural areas; and 2) NTIA’s mechanism for selecting projects appears to have been largely incoherent. The rationale for rural subsidies has been debunked by scores of economists – the programs turn out to be inefficient income transfer mechanisms and do not tend to increase subscriptions, but Congress forced NTIA to award subsidies. In its awards, NTIA adopted a system that led to awards differing by more than a factor of 100 in terms of expected cost-effectiveness. Had it adopted a more reasonable framework, many more households could have been connected for the same money, or the same number of connections could have been realized for a fraction of the cost.

Date: 2013-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/13-008.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www-siepr.stanford.edu:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sip:dpaper:13-008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Shor ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).