PROPOSALS FOR LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE LEGAL REGIME OF THE DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE UNIVERSITY ETHICS COMMISSION - BETWEEN NECESSITY AND URGENCY
Laura Manea () and
Cristina Mihaela Salca-Rotaru ()
Additional contact information
Laura Manea: Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania
Cristina Mihaela Salca-Rotaru: Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2021, vol. 10, issue Special Issue, 121-132
Abstract:
Speaking of university ethics since the first decade of the XXII century, we would be tempted to consider that the principles of academic ethics are relatively recent or that the need for regulation has become stringent in the current context of the information society, in which the detection of plagiarism, for example, is favored by internet technology. In fact, what is recent is the intervention of the legislator, including in the Romanian education system, in establishing the rules for sanctioning the violation of the principles of university ethics. The study starts from the principles of the national higher education system enunciated in art. 118 of Law no. 1/2011, analyzes the regulations of the section dedicated to university ethics in the special normative act (art. 306-310 and art. 318-326 of the National Education Law) but also of other normative acts (Law no. 206/2004) and refers to the analysis of the content and statistics of the decisions of the courts invested to rule on the appeals of decisions aimed at sanctioning deviations from university ethics. The conclusions are in the sense of the need for the legislative harmonization of the provisions incident to the activity of the university ethics commissions between the two normative acts, Law no. 206/2004 and Law no. 1/2011, at least as regards the classification of the decisions/reports of the ethics commissions between an act of labor law or an administrative act and the elimination of the ambiguity from the legal texts. Finally, are presented proposals for legislative changes deemed appropriate for legislative harmonization.
Keywords: university ethics commission; report; decision; administrative act; labor law act; jurisprudence. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H79 K31 K40 K41 K49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An10se/12.%20Manea,%20Salca-Rotaru.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sja:journl:v:10:y:2021:i:special:p:121-132
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Perspectives of Law and Public Administration from Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().