 WAIVING THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION ACCORDING TO THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 23/2016Ion Rusu ()
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2019, vol. 8, issue 2, 305-310 Abstract: In the present paper we have examined the institution of waiving the criminal prosecution, as provided in the current law, a text which was modified after the publication of the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. 23/2016. We also considered the formulation of critical opinions regarding the possible existence of other elements of unconstitutionality in the text in force. A very important aspect is the notification of the absence in the text, of some provisions that condition the application of the institution on the need to repair the prejudice caused to the victim. The paper can be useful to students and master students of the country's faculties, as well as practitioners in the field. Also, the work can be useful to the legislator for operating some changes in the current content of the text that regulates this institution. Keywords: crime; critical opinions; de lege ferenda proposals; criteria. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sja:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:305-310 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Perspectives of Law and Public Administration from Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.