 RIGHT TO A NAME IN TERMS OF IDENTITY RIGHTOana Nicoleta Retea ()
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2020, vol. 9, issue 2, 147-154 Abstract: The identity of a person mainly supports discussions in a philosophical way, its definition being the subject of multiple debates. However, from a philosophical point of view there is no unanimity regarding the concept of identity, the established interpretations cumulating a series of common points, but subject to the mark of personality. In order to satisfy the need to differentiate humans in all manifestations of social life, and in order not to give rise to confusions about one's identity, the use of the name was imposed. The aim of this article is to contribute to a better understanding of both rights and to emphasis each and any existing connection between them. Another aspect that determined the elaboration of this article is represented by the fact that the doctrine is largely limited in treating the name right only in the chapter allocated to the identification attribute of the natural person without emphasizing its valences according to the conclusive legal relations. Keywords: name; identity; digital identity; fundamental rights. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:147-154 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Perspectives of Law and Public Administration from Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.