Corporate Conflict as a Factor in the Positive Development of Socio-economic Relations

Oleg V. Osipenko ()
Additional contact information
Oleg V. Osipenko: Synergy University

Journal of Modern Competition, 2022, vol. 16, issue 4, 49-59

Abstract: The article is based on the current practice of researching Russian economic, corporate management and judicial application jurisprudence and reveals the paradox of a positive study of corporate conflict on business development, its social resource and its intra-company regulatory base. The author shows that replicated practices of managing groups of corporate conflicts, highlighting obvious regulatory contradictions or alogisms corresponding to the algorithms, signaling the situation of the rule-making process and the expert community of the need to adjust the relevant rules; corporate conflicts in diversified holdings inevitably lead to random outcomes; a non-destructive option for resolving a corporate conflict allows you to increase the group from “smoldering manifestations” of character strengthening, which are corporate contradictions of co-owners or participants and top managers brought to a high degree of aggravation; shareholder antagonisms demonstrate a pronounced institutional energy and an applied demonstration of the usefulness of peacefulness and compromise in conducting polemics defending their mismatched, including diametrically opposed interests of the co-owners of the company; identified cases of occurrence of cases of cardiovascular disorders, initiated by a weak corporate-legal relationship for the management of a group or set of companies, resulting in their defeat, leading to the identification of positive adjustments in corporate behavior for the control of the party; counteracting corporate conflict among children contributes to the development of methodological and applied foundations for company risk management. An internal corporate conflict in the public mind is a spontaneous, but at the same time objectively justified method of protest, which does not cause chances of victory as such, but conditionally works as a stimulus for the creation of civil-democratic foundations of society.

Keywords: corporate conflict; corporate disputes; constructive functions of the conflict; institutes; corporate law; majority shareholder; minority shareholder; company beneficiary; company governing bodies; top manager; member of the supervisory board; holding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/995 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:16:y:2022:i:4:p:49-59

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://moderncompetition.ru

DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-49-59

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Modern Competition is currently edited by Yury Rubin

More articles in Journal of Modern Competition from Synergy University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Synergy University Maintainer ().