The Right to Development in Zimbabwe’s Second Republic

Kucaca Ivumile Phulu () and Serges Djoyou Kamga
Additional contact information
Kucaca Ivumile Phulu: University of South Africa
Serges Djoyou Kamga: University of South Africa

A chapter in Making Politics in Zimbabwe’s Second Republic, 2023, pp 189-205 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The emergence of the post-Mugabe government sparked a frenzy of speculation about whether it heralds the beginning of a new era or simply more of the same. Against the “open for business” slogan and positive language around rights implementation, we assess if the new administration genuinely understands and is committed to implement Zimbabwe’s right to development. The Zimbabwean Constitution recognises a distinct right to development, following the spirit of the African Charter. The right to development is therefore more than just a social or political demand; it is also a legal right with enforceable legal responsibilities on governments to promote, defend, and fulfil the right to development. The Second Republic’s shortcoming has been in failing to deliver on its promises. This is seen in its reaction to the Covid-19 pandemic. While it sought to establish a suitable legislative framework for dealing with the pandemic, it failed horribly in putting its policies into action. For example, Zimbabwe’s government has failed to show transparency in how it handled millions of dollars of donated funds for the pandemic. Corruption was allowed to run helter-skelter and the Minister of Health was implicated in swindling almost, if not, all the donations. All this was taking place while lives were at stake. Further, the opposition contends that the government’s democratic rhetoric is not matching with what is obtained on the ground and cites the persecution of opposition leaders, labour leaders and civil society activists, among other issues. This exemplifies the typical government practice of failing to live up to the constitutional obligation of ensuring the right to development on a consistent basis. The Mnangagwa government has failed to implement the right to development in practice, despite putting in place policy and legislation consistent with the right to development. In this respect, even on what would seem like a safe and risk-free policy initiative (after all, who would argue against the right to development), the Mnangagwa’s government’s formative project falls short.

Keywords: Development; Right to development; Government; Second Republic; Zimbabwe; Constitution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-031-30129-2_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031301292

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30129-2_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().