A Comparative Assessment of Democracy and Good Governance Dividends in Egypt, Ghana, Mauritius, and Senegal

Mataywa Busieka ()
Additional contact information
Mataywa Busieka: Northwest University

Chapter Chapter 14 in Political Governance and the African Peer Review Mechanism, 2025, pp 263-283 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of a two-decade comparative study that evaluates the dividends of democracy and good governance in Egypt, Ghana, Mauritius, and Senegal, utilizing the lens of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) indicators. The study aims to analyse the progress and maturation of democratic systems and governance practices in these four African countries, shedding light on the key factors that have contributed to their development or hindered their advancement. The theoretical framework employed in this research draws from the concepts of democracy and good governance. Democracy encompasses political systems characterized by free and fair elections, respect for human rights, rule of law, transparency, and citizen participation. Good governance emphasizes effective institutions, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, and inclusiveness. These frameworks provide the basis for evaluating the performance of Egypt, Ghana, Mauritius, and Senegal. The study utilizes the APRM indicators as a tool for comparative analysis. The APRM framework, developed by the African Union, assesses Member states’ political, economic, corporate, and socio-economic governance. By employing this framework, the research evaluates the four countries’ adherence to democratic principles, the effectiveness of governance structures, and the impact on development outcomes. The findings of the study contribute to a deeper understanding of the progress made by Egypt, Ghana, Mauritius, and Senegal in the realm of democracy and good governance over the past two decades. The study identifies commonalities and differences in the four countries’ experiences, highlighting the success stories and challenges faced in each context. This research has implications for policymaking and development strategies in Africa. By identifying the factors that have facilitated or hindered the dividends of democracy and good governance, policymakers can formulate targeted interventions to strengthen democratic institutions, enhance governance practices, and foster sustainable development.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-031-85911-3_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031859113

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-85911-3_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().