A Paradigm Transformation in Vietnam’s Auditing Profession Driven by Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics
Dao Thanh Binh,
Nguyen Phuong Anh () and
Nguyen Thi Mai Chi
Additional contact information
Dao Thanh Binh: Hanoi University of Science and Technology, School of Economics and Management
Nguyen Phuong Anh: Hanoi University of Science and Technology, School of Economics and Management
Nguyen Thi Mai Chi: Hanoi University of Science and Technology, School of Economics and Management
A chapter in Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Challenges: Business Dynamics in Disruptive Economy (ICECH 2025), 2026, pp 7-20 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract Research purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore how artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the audit profession in Vietnam. It explores the ways in which new technologies, evolving regulations, and market pressures are reshaping the role of auditors, and identifies what skills and strategies are required for firms to adapt successfully. Research motivation: Vietnam offers a unique context for studying AI adoption in auditing. On one hand, the government actively promotes digital transformation and the Big Four are advancing in AI applications. On the other hand, many small and medium-sized firms face financial, technical, and regulatory barriers that slow adoption. At the same time, the absence of AI-specific auditing standards creates uncertainty, making it difficult for firms to fully embrace innovation. This tension highlights the need to understand both the opportunities and challenges of AI adoption in Vietnam’s audit sector. Research design, approach, and method: The study adopts a qualitative, exploratory approach. It synthesizes insights from academic literature, regulatory documents, and industry reports to map current adoption patterns, highlight challenges, and propose a multi-stakeholder framework for responsible AI integration into Vietnamese audit practice. Main findings: The study finds that AI is not replacing auditors but rather enhancing their work by automating routine tasks and enabling them to focus on higher-value activities such as judgment, skepticism, and strategic analysis. While the Big Four can invest heavily in advanced AI solutions, local firms face financial and technical constraints, leading to a widening gap. Another key finding is the “regulatory paradox”: although the government and the State Audit Office of Vietnam encourage AI adoption, current auditing standards do not yet provide clear guidance, leaving firms to design their own governance frameworks. As a result, the future of AI in auditing depends largely on regulatory modernization and stronger collaboration between firms, technology providers, regulators, and educational institutions. Practical/managerial implications: Audit firms should tailor strategies to their capacity, with Big Four advancing high-end AI solutions and local firms leveraging partnerships with domestic vendors. Regulators need to update auditing standards to reduce legal uncertainty, while universities should embed digital and AI skills into curricula to prepare future auditors. Together, these actions can narrow the technology gap and enhance audit quality in Vietnam.
Keywords: auditing; artificial intelligence; Vietnam; regulatory paradox; digital transformation; data analytics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-622-7_2
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789462396227
DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-622-7_2
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().