Current status and future prospects of research on the recognition of Academic Papers Masterpiece

Wang Xu, Liu Hui (), Zhang Ying, Ren Huiling and Wang Junhui
Additional contact information
Wang Xu: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library
Liu Hui: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library
Zhang Ying: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library
Ren Huiling: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library
Wang Junhui: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library

A chapter in Proceedings of 2023 China Science and Technology Information Resource Management and Service Annual Conference (COINFO 2023), 2024, pp 92-104 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract [Purpose] This paper analyzes the development status of research on magnum opus recognition theory and methods in academic papers, and clarifies the future development direction of related research, which is aim at providing reference for subsequent research on the method system of magnus recognition. [Methods] This paper mainly uses the literature research method, subject analysis and content analysis method to carry out the whole research. The LDA topic model written based on python used as input to collect bibliographic data for topic clustering. According to the results of topic clustering, sort out the relevant theoretical system and method application, analyze the major and difficult problems in the process, and clarify research status and development trend of the theory and method of the recognition of academic papers masterpieces. [Conclusion and Prospect]Representative recognition is developing in the direction of intelligence, compound and network, however, the research on the theory and method of academic papers masterpieces is still not complete. There are still some problems in the recognition of masterpieces, such as the objects identification individual particularity, the disciplines and the research directions heterogeneity, the inflexibility of the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, and the applicability of the masterpieces to authors of different levels. How to fully comprehend the semantic context information in the massive academic achievements and set up reasonable quantitative indicators of recognition is the future direction of representative recognition efforts we should make.

Keywords: Academic Papers Masterpieces; Representative Identification; Research status (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-498-3_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789464634983

DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-498-3_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().