Exploring the Compensation Mechanisms for Land Acquisition in China Based on the Experiences of Hangzhou Xihu District and Guangzhou Nansha District’s “Residential Property Resettlement Compensation” Policies

Wu Yixuan ()
Additional contact information
Wu Yixuan: Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

A chapter in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2024), 2024, pp 66-75 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Residential land resettlement is a compensatory policy introduced in the process of urbanisation in China to ensure that landless peasants can obtain long-term livelihood security, and it is an important measure to maintain social stability and development[1]. In terms of the whole country, Hangzhou and Guangzhou have the earliest and strongest implementation of the policy of “land reservation and resettlement”, which to a certain extent has made it possible for the expropriated farmers not to lower their original living standards and to secure their long-term livelihood. However, there are still a lot of problems in the concrete practice, therefore, Hangzhou and Guangzhou have started to explore a new type of compensation mechanism – “retained property resettlement”, of which the “three unity” policy of Hangzhou Xihu District and the “three unity” policy of Guangzhou Nanzhou Municipality are the first to be implemented. The “three unity” policy of Xihu District of Hangzhou and the “currency plus property” compensation policy of Nansha District of Guangzhou have achieved remarkable results in practice. Therefore, the article will compare and analyse the policy standards and development modes of the two cities, and analyse the basic elements from the scale standard of the retained property resettlement, the nature of the ownership, the conditions of the land, the development use, and the mode of operation, and so on. Therefore, the article will compare and analyse the policy standards and development modes of the two places, from the scale standards of the reserved property resettlement, the nature of ownership, the conditions of land use, the development use, the operation mode, etc., and then summarise the universal experience that can be promoted under the new situation, so as to achieve the goals of policy for the people, safeguard stability and promote social harmony[2].

Keywords: land acquisition compensation; “retained property resettlement”; Hangzhou Xihu District; Guangzhou Nansha District (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-538-6_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789464635386

DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-538-6_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().