Explaining CSR Performance with Contextual Factors: Focus on Development Banks

Ana Kundid Novokmet () and Andrijana Rogošić
Additional contact information
Ana Kundid Novokmet: University of Split
Andrijana Rogošić: University of Split

A chapter in Finance in Central and Southeastern Europe, 2017, pp 103-123 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract With a stronghold in the institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR), a hypothesis is made on banks’ CSR performance being positively driven with the contextual factors, i.e., countries’ macroeconomic and institutional development and their banking sectors’ development (briefly country development level). Development banks, rather than commercial banks, are at the center of the empirical evidence, mainly because they are perceived to be socially responsible institutions by their definition, as well as the best in class example for commercial banks’ CSR practices in certain country. CSR performance is measured throughout CSR reporting quantity and reporting form following Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. By combining the aforementioned data and the World Bank’s data for 22 European countries in 2013 out of which 15 are Balkan and Eastern European countries and the rest Western European countries, we find out that GDP per capita, research, and development expenditure over GDP, gross savings over GDP, and employment of total labor force are positively related to development banks’ CSR performance, while banking sector variables (net interest margin and regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets) are negatively related to development banks’ CSR. Countries’ institutional development variables are also connected to development banks’ CSR performance, but with rather slight differences between better and lower performing development banks with regard to CSR. Thus, more developed economic systems as well as less profitable banking systems, which have lower level of regulatory burden have higher performance of development banks’ CSR when K-means clustering approach was adopted. An important caveat of the research is that there is a trade-off between cost of banking intermediation and development banks’ CSR performance, while macroeconomic performance and CSR performance are in complementary relationship. Altogether, a conclusion is made that banks’ CSR performance is rather modestly explained by the country development level in the previous empirical works and thus a more general approach when researching and creating public policies about the CSR phenomenon is required.

Keywords: Banks; Development banks; Corporate social responsibility; Sustainability accounting; GRI guidelines; Institutional theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-64662-6_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319646626

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64662-6_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contributions to Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().