An Ethical Framework for Constructive Sustainability Debate in Political Forums: Aristotle’s Principles of “Deliberative Rhetoric” for Analysis of Rhetorical Argumentation

Simon McLaughlin ()
Additional contact information
Simon McLaughlin: School of Communication and Arts, University of Queensland

A chapter in Strategic Sustainability Communication, 2025, pp 455-473 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter develops an ethical framework for strategic sustainability communication in political speech and applies this framework to an analysis of an Australian parliamentary debate on climate change. In the Australian Parliament, political speakers have been criticised for an impractical and unethical debate surrounding climate legislation. Notwithstanding the multiple political and discursive factors influencing the debate, I contend that in the mechanics of rhetorical argumentation lie potential solutions. Following a brief discussion on sustainability communication and rhetorical argumentation, this chapter draws from Aristotle’s instruction on the “deliberative species” of rhetoric to develop a rhetorical framework that promotes practical reasoning for civic decision-making within contemporary pluralistic debate. Key to my Aristotelian approach are three principles to maintain practical arguments: First, the argumentation should be deliberative and the premises of arguments should be derived from relevant civic topics; Second, the argumentation should follow a practical line of reasoning using logical deductions; Finally, emotional appeals are tied to practical arguments. In my qualitative, exploratory, conceptual study, I apply this framework as a novel approach to the analysis of rhetorical argumentation in political speech. I make a case study of two Australian Parliamentary speeches from legislative debate in 2021 in which the speakers take opposing views on the utility of climate change legislation. I determine to what extent their rhetorical argumentation contributes to practical debate based on the three criteria of my Aristotelian framework. I finish by posing this analytical framework as a model for further research in sustainability communication and beyond.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-89486-2_27

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031894862

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-89486-2_27

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().