Board Composition and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from JSE-Listed Real Estate Firms

David Kitulazzi (), Frank K. Ametefe (), Samuel Azasu and Patricia Gabaldon Quiñonones ()
Additional contact information
David Kitulazzi: University of Cape Town
Frank K. Ametefe: University of Cape Town
Samuel Azasu: University of Navarra
Patricia Gabaldon Quiñonones: IE University

A chapter in ESG Disclosures in the Southern African Development Community, 2025, pp 55-78 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The study aims to investigate the relationship between board composition and the performance of JSE-listed real estate firms. It employs panel data analysis to estimate the impact of board composition elements on the performance of JSE listed real estate firms in South Africa using financial and sustainability data sourced from Bloomberg. It considered board composition elements, board size, proportions of non-executive directors, independent directors, and females on boards. Three main performances were explored: financial performance, market value, and sustainability. Return on assets and return on equity were used to measure firm financial performance while Tobin’s Q was used to measure firm value. Environmental and Social scores were used to measure firm sustainability performance. The findings indicate that female directors on boards positively and significantly impact financial and sustainability performance but not firm value. Board size was found to negatively and significantly impact financial performance but positively and insignificantly impact firm value and sustainability. The proportion of non-executive directors did not significantly impact any of the performance metrics examined. The proportion of independent directors on boards negatively impacts financial performance and positively impact sustainability. We recommend that companies emphasize the qualifications, experience, and skills that female board members bring to boards. CEOs and other corporate executives should not directly participate in the appointment of non-executive and independent board members. This would ensure that they are better able to play the monitoring role required of them. Firms should also critically consider the number of board members required for effective decision-making and monitoring.

Keywords: Agency theory; Black economic empowerment (BEE); Board composition; Board independence; Corporate governance; Corporate social responsibility; Demographic diversity; Board of directors; Environmental sustainability; ESG framework; Female directors; Firm financial performance; Firm value; Gender diversity; Independent directors; Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE); Optimal board size; Panel regression analysis; Performance evaluation; Performance metrics; Racial diversity; Real estate firms; Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs); Resource dependency; Return on assets; Shareholder interests; Social sustainability; South Africa; Sustainability performance; Tobin’s Q (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-96205-9_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031962059

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-96205-9_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().