Using Multiple Pharmacovigilance Models Improves the Timeliness of Signal Detection in Simulated Prospective Surveillance

Rolina D. van Gaalen (), Michal Abrahamowicz and David L. Buckeridge
Additional contact information
Rolina D. van Gaalen: McGill University
Michal Abrahamowicz: McGill University
David L. Buckeridge: McGill University

Drug Safety, 2017, vol. 40, issue 11, No 7, 1119-1129

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Prospective pharmacovigilance aims to rapidly detect safety concerns related to medical products. The exposure model selected for pharmacovigilance impacts the timeliness of signal detection. However, in most real-life pharmacovigilance studies, little is known about which model correctly represents the association and there is no evidence to guide the selection of an exposure model. Different exposure models reflect different aspects of exposure history, and their relevance varies across studies. Therefore, one potential solution is to apply several alternative exposure models simultaneously, with each model assuming a different exposure–risk association, and then combine the model results. Methods We simulated alternative clinically plausible associations between time-varying drug exposure and the hazard of an adverse event. Prospective surveillance was conducted on the simulated data by estimating parametric and semi-parametric exposure–risk models at multiple times during follow-up. For each model separately, and using combined evidence from different subsets of models, we compared the time to signal detection. Results Timely detection across the simulated associations was obtained by fitting a set of pharmacovigilance models. This set included alternative parametric models that assumed different exposure–risk associations and flexible models that made no assumptions regarding the form/shape of the association. Times to detection generated using a simple combination of evidence from multiple models were comparable to those observed under the ideal, but unrealistic, scenario where pharmacovigilance relied on the single ‘true’ model used for data generation. Conclusions Simulation results indicate that, if the true model is not known, an association can be detected in a more timely manner by first fitting a carefully selected set of exposure–risk models and then generating a signal as soon as any of the models considered yields a test statistic value below a predetermined testing threshold.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-017-0555-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:40:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-017-0555-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/40264

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0555-9

Access Statistics for this article

Drug Safety is currently edited by Nitin Joshi

More articles in Drug Safety from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().