Systematic scenario modeling for priority assessment of sustainable development goals in China under interaction and uncertainty

Renlong Wang (), Shutian Cui () and Mingang Gao ()
Additional contact information
Renlong Wang: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shutian Cui: Northwest A&F University
Mingang Gao: Chinese Academy of Sciences

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 2025, vol. 27, issue 7, No 32, 15886 pages

Abstract: Abstract As an integrated and indivisible agenda encompassing the realms of economics, society, and the environment, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) manifest intricate interactions and uncertainties. These complexities pose numerous challenges for nations in their pursuit of the SDGs, including the need to harmonize SDGs (co-benefits or trade-offs), prioritize SDGs, and shape forward-thinking and coordinated development pathways. Consequently, this study introduces a systematic scenario modeling approach, founded upon the CIA-ISM framework, to assess SDG priority and analyze development pathways. The approach is a scalable and generic modeling approach that can effectively addresses the interactions between the SDGs while accounting for uncertainty. Modeling with the focus on the 17 SDGs, the implementation of the CIA-ISM framework initially engages the experts to estimate the occurrence likelihood and interaction degree of SDGs, thereby facilitating priority assessment, causal scenario generation, and sensitivity analysis. This study utilizes China as a demonstrative application for the proposed framework and validates the outcomes through expert feedback and pertinent literature. Based on the outcomes, three SDG implementation pathways of China are recommended with the most robust and foundational causal loops G1 and G5 as the starting point: G1 + G5 → G8 → G3 → G7; G1 + G5 → G2 → G13 → G15, and G1 + G5 → G2 → G6 + G12. Overall, the CIA-ISM-based scenario modeling approach proves adept at capturing the prioritized and hierarchically clear causal pathways of the SDGs, arising from their intricate interaction, while factoring in uncertainty.

Keywords: Sustainable development goals; Priority assessment; Interaction; Uncertainty; Systematic scenario modeling; CIA-ISM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04526-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04526-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10668

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04526-4

Access Statistics for this article

Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development is currently edited by Luc Hens

More articles in Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().