Assessment of electric power options for reducing SO x and CO 2 emissions in northeastern China

Takayuki Takeshita and Kenji Yamaji

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2002, vol. 5, issue 1, 63-103

Abstract: This study comprehensively assessed the technological options for reducing SO x and CO 2 emissions in northeastern China’s electric power sector with the linear programming models that take into consideration technological and regional characteristics in detail. We assessed the options for existing coal-fired power plants in the static analysis and the options for new ones in the dynamic analysis. According to the results, coal washing and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) are superior in reducing SO x , but they cannot reduce CO 2 sufficiently. Natural gas and nuclear power are superior in reducing CO 2 , and SO x is reduced dramatically by them as well. Integrated gasification combustion cycle (IGCC) and pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) have large emissions reduction potential but are inferior in terms of cost. Supercritical unit and wind power are relatively superior in reducing CO 2 . The optimal composition of power plants and the assessment of photovoltaic (PV) power depend on the shape of the daily load curve. PV is much inferior to other options in reducing SO x and CO 2 . In addition, the avoided capacity by introducing PV is very small. The results imply that accelerating the utilization of coal washing and FGD should be given greater emphasis in China. It is also suggested that China could reduce SO x economically by introducing natural gas, IGCC, or PFBC as the measures for CO 2 reduction through such frameworks as the clean development mechanism. Copyright Springer Japan 2002

Keywords: Clean coal technologies; Photovoltaic power; SO x and CO 2 emissions reduction; Power generation best mix model; Technology assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03354024 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envpol:v:5:y:2002:i:1:p:63-103

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... mental/journal/10018

DOI: 10.1007/BF03354024

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies is currently edited by Ken-Ichi Akao

More articles in Environmental Economics and Policy Studies from Springer, Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().