Monitoring the dispersal of contaminants by wildlife at nuclear weapons production and waste storage facilities

Michael L. Morrison, K. Shawn Smallwood and Jan Beyea
Additional contact information
Michael L. Morrison: California State University
K. Shawn Smallwood: California State University
Jan Beyea: California State University

Environment Systems and Decisions, 1997, vol. 17, issue 4, 289-295

Abstract: Abstract Professor of wildlife biology in the department of biological sciences, California State University. Dr K. Shawn Smallwood is a systems ecologist and may be contacted at 109 Luz Place, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Dr Jan Beyea is a physical scientist with Consulting in the Public Interest, 53 Clinton Street, Lambertville, NJ 08530, USA. The US Government produced and acquired approximately 111 t of plutonium in support of its nuclear weapons programme. Verified reports of the loss of nuclear material into the environment, including loss by animals, has raised questions regarding the monitoring programmes in place on the nuclear facilities. Given these concerns regarding the fate of stored nuclear waste, the authors conducted a review of the wildlife monitoring programme used at nuclear weapons and storage facilities by (1) reviewing the key facets of the monitoring used at the facilities, (2) evaluating published and unpublished data from the facilities and (3) incorporating data from personal site visits. The study concentrated on the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in rural south–central Washington and the Rocky Flats Plant in central Colorado. Based on the review, it is concluded that an improved and rigorous environmental surveillance and monitoring programme is needed at both locations. The site surveys identified frequent instances of intrusion into burial sites by animals, most of which had gone unreported by Hanford and Rocky Flats personnel. It was apparent that a significant source of potential contamination was not being adequately monitored at the nuclear waste sites. It is recommended that the development of a systematic, well-planned programme of monitoring animal intrusion on burial sites be considered, coupled with improved training for responsible personnel.

Keywords: Nuclear Waste; Nuclear Weapon; Burial Site; Storage Facility; Personal Site (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1018553528393 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:17:y:1997:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1018553528393

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/10669

DOI: 10.1023/A:1018553528393

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment Systems and Decisions from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().