From “Finance Capital” to “Organized Capitalism:” Socialization in Rudolf Hilferding’s Writings Under the Influence of Ferdinand Tönnies

Jan Greitens ()
Additional contact information
Jan Greitens: DHBW Mosbach

A chapter in The First Socialization Debate (1918) and Early Efforts Towards Socialization, 2019, pp 17-30 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Rudolf Hilferding’s ideas regarding the development of capitalism, as presented in his seminal work entitled “Finance Capital” (published 1910) and in his concept of “Organized Capitalism” (developed after the war and finalized in 1927) both describe the transition to socialism. They differ in the instruments used to reach this aim, their understanding of property, and the role of the state. This paper presents the development to socialism as described by Hilferding in “Finance Capital,” his ideas during his time in the Socialization Commissions in Germany (1918–1920), and his concept of “Organized Capitalism.” Afterwards, the ideas of Ferdinand Tönnies regarding socialism and property, along with his enormous influence on Hilferding’s concepts, are presented. The astonishing thing about Hilferding’s ideas is the unbroken continuity in his theoretical constructions. The experiences of the years around 1918 did not make Hilferding change his theoretical positions. Only the question of how socialism can be achieved, whether revolutionary (as in “Finance Capital”) or democratic (as in the “Organized Capitalism”), has changed. Instead of despairing on the failure of the 1919 revolution, he interpreted the new political situation positively and adapted his theory with the new concept of “Organized Capitalism” into one that posits a democratic and gradual transformation instead of a revolution. He now regards the state as a political instrument with which to build socialism. Hilferding rejects a (second, which would mean a Bolshevik) revolution, a political overthrow, and wants to effectively transform the economy over a longer period by means of a democratic state. Along with this continuity, Hilferding was not able to include new approaches focusing on the demand side of the economy.

Keywords: Hilferding; Tönnies; Finance capital; Organized capitalism; Socialization; B14; B31; E11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:euhchp:978-3-030-15024-2_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030150242

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15024-2_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().