Preferences for health-related quality of life: do they vary by age? A systematic literature review on the EQ-5D measure

Alhanouf Alabbad, Madeleine Cochrane and Paul Mark Mitchell ()
Additional contact information
Alhanouf Alabbad: National Pharmacovigilance Center, Saudi Food and Drug Authority
Madeleine Cochrane: Health Economics and Health Policy, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol
Paul Mark Mitchell: Health Economics and Health Policy, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol

The European Journal of Health Economics, 2025, vol. 26, issue 7, No 12, 1275-1291

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a commonly used method in Health technology assessment (HTA) that utilises generic metrics such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). QALY is a measure derived from individuals’ preferences for different health states, with these preferences represented as utility values. However, utility values may differ by age, raising equity concerns in healthcare allocation. Given the globally ageing demographic, understanding the age-utility relationship becomes essential. Objectives This systematic review aimed to explore the impact of age on utility values derived from the EQ-5D, a widely used instrument in CUA that contributes to calculating QALYs by assessing five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Methods Our search used the comprehensive pearl growing approach and database searching. We included studies that analysed the effect of age on EQ-5D utility values in the general population. We excluded qualitative, non-English, and non-EQ-5D instrument studies. Quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and a narrative synthesis was used. Results Of the 28 studies reviewed, primarily from Europe and the Americas, the average age of participants ranged from 34.1 and 47.7 years. Around 46% (n = 13) associated older age with lower utility values; 28% (n = 8) with higher utility; and 25% (n = 7) found no consistent relationship between age and utility. Discussion Age was identified as a critical factor affecting EQ-5D-derived utility values, with implications for the equitable distribution of healthcare resources. These findings corroborate previous research on utility measurement across different instruments, highlighting the ethical and policy issues due to age-related utility differences.

Keywords: EQ-5D Utility Values; Age-Utility Relationship; Healthcare resource allocation; Health Equity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01766-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01766-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10198/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01766-7

Access Statistics for this article

The European Journal of Health Economics is currently edited by J.-M.G.v.d. Schulenburg

More articles in The European Journal of Health Economics from Springer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().