Family Formation Trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the Second Demographic Transition?
Trajectoires de formation de la famille en Roumanie, en Fédération de Russie et en France: en direction de la Seconde Transition Démographique?
Gina Potârcă (),
Melinda Mills () and
Laurent Lesnard ()
Additional contact information
Gina Potârcă: University of Groningen
Melinda Mills: University of Groningen
Laurent Lesnard: Centre de Données Socio-Politiques, Sciences Po
European Journal of Population, 2013, vol. 29, issue 1, No 3, 69-101
Abstract:
Abstract This study examines family formation trajectories as a manifestation of the second demographic transition (SDT) in three countries, comparing and contrasting two post-socialist countries (Romania and the Russian Federation) with France as benchmark country advanced in the SDT. By examining combined partnership and fertility sequences and transcending the mainly descriptive nature of trajectory-based studies, the current study expands our knowledge by including key explanatory factors, such as cohort, country, and educational level. Pooled data from the Gender and Generations Survey (N = 30,197) is used to engage in sequence, optimal matching (OM), cluster and multinomial logistic regression analysis. Post-Communist cohorts are significantly more likely to engage in long-term cohabitation, childbearing within cohabitation or lone parenthood. Educational level operates differently across countries, with the highly educated in Romania and the Russian Federation less likely to follow certain de-standardized paths. Non-marital cohabitation with children is associated with lower education in all countries. Strong differences emerge between the shape and stages of the SDT in Romania and Russia, with Russians having a higher probability to experience childbearing within cohabitation, opposed to Romanians who follow childless marriage patterns or adopt postponement and singlehood. The three countries differ in their advancement in the SDT and factors shaping partnering and childbearing choices. We conclude that although the SDT remains a useful construct, it needs to be supplemented with more nuanced contextual accounts of socio-economic conditions.
Keywords: Partnerships and fertility trajectories; Young adulthood; Sequence analysis; Cross-national comparison; Trajectoires d’unions et de fécondité; Jeunes adultes; Analyse de séquence; Comparaisons transnationales (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:29:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-012-9279-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10680
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Population is currently edited by Helga A.G. de Valk
More articles in European Journal of Population from Springer, European Association for Population Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().