EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Risk identification and prioritization in banking projects of payment service provider companies: an empirical study

Mohammad Khalilzadeh (), Laleh Katoueizadeh () and Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ()
Additional contact information
Mohammad Khalilzadeh: CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School
Laleh Katoueizadeh: Islamic Azad University
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Institute of Sustainable Construction

Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2020, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-27

Abstract: Abstract Identifying risks and prioritizing is important for payment service provider (PSP) companies to get banking projects and gain more market share. However, studies regarding the identification of risks and causal relationships are insufficient in the Iranian PSP industry and the industry is unique because of its characteristics. In this study, 30 experts involved with PSP companies are employed as the research sample. Eleven key risks and Forty-six sub-risks are also identified. Subsequently, the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory technique is applied to determine the effective and affected risks and the severity of their effects on each other. Finally, all risks are ranked. Due to the internal interrelationships of the main risks, the weight of each risk is calculated via the fuzzy analytic network process. As the second-level risks have no significant interrelationships, they are ranked via the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Moreover, the best-worst method is used to ensure that the obtained rankings are reliable. This study identifies the risks affecting the loss of banking projects and determines the impacts of these risks on each. A sensitivity analysis is then conducted on the weights of the criteria, and the results are compared.

Keywords: Payment service provider (PSP); Risk identification; Risk assessment; Fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL); Fuzzy analytic network process (ANP); Best-worst method (BWM); Prioriation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s11782-020-00083-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fobric:v:14:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s11782-020-00083-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://fbr.springeropen.com/

DOI: 10.1186/s11782-020-00083-5

Access Statistics for this article

Frontiers of Business Research in China is currently edited by Jiye Mao, Ziliang Deng and Steven Shuye Wang

More articles in Frontiers of Business Research in China from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:fobric:v:14:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s11782-020-00083-5