Retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs using two payment systems: the diagnosis related groups (DRG) and the Queralt system, a newly developed case-mix tool for hospitalized patients

Júlia Folguera, Elisabet Buj, David Monterde, Gerard Carot-Sans, Isaac Cano, Jordi Piera-Jiménez () and Miquel Arrufat
Additional contact information
Júlia Folguera: Catalan Health Service
Elisabet Buj: Catalan Institute of Health
David Monterde: Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3) – Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)
Gerard Carot-Sans: Catalan Health Service
Isaac Cano: Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona - Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB- IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona
Jordi Piera-Jiménez: Catalan Health Service
Miquel Arrufat: Catalan Institute of Health

Health Economics Review, 2024, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-9

Abstract: Abstract Background Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system. Methods Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity. Results The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011–5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system. Conclusions The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.

Keywords: Hospital costs; Case-mix tools; Diagnosis-related groups; Queralt system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00522-6 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00522-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13561

DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00522-6

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics Review is currently edited by J. Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

More articles in Health Economics Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().