Fragmentation of payment systems: an in-depth qualitative study of stakeholders’ experiences with the neonatal intensive care payment system in Iran

Zakieh Ostad-Ahmadi, Miriam Nkangu, Mahmood Nekoei-Moghadam, Mohammad Heidarzadeh, Reza Goudarzi and Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi ()
Additional contact information
Zakieh Ostad-Ahmadi: Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Miriam Nkangu: Bruyere Research Institute
Mahmood Nekoei-Moghadam: Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Mohammad Heidarzadeh: Zahedan University of Medical Science
Reza Goudarzi: Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi: Kerman University of Medical Sciences

Health Economics Review, 2024, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Abstract Background Iran’s fee-for-service (FFS) payment model in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is contentious due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders with differing interests, leading to increased costs, fragmentation, and reduced quality of care. This study explores the experiences and challenges of stakeholders with the NICU payment system and considers alternative payment methods. Method A qualitative research approach was used, involving key informant interviews with stakeholders at various levels of the health system. Data were collected between March 2022 to September 2023 using a purposive sampling method with a snowball strategy. The transcribed data were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach in MAXQDA, with themes and sub-themes emerged and assessed by two independent coders. Four trustworthiness criteria were applied to ensure the quality of the results. Results The study involved 23 participants with diverse NICU payment backgrounds, identifying issues related to service accessibility, rising costs, neonatologists’ income, and service quality. Stakeholders held differing views on the best payment model: health insurance executives favored a prospective payment method, faculty members favored supported modified FFS or per diem, and neonatal specialists expressed concerns about low tariffs and delayed payments. Conclusion Iran’s NICU payment system is unsatisfactory and requires urgent reform. Although stakeholders disagree on the best approach, reforms must be evidence-based and collaborative, addressing structural and cultural issues within the health system. The identification of an optimal payment system is essential for supporting neonatal care, benefiting newborns, families, society, and the broader health system.

Keywords: Neonatal intensive care unit; Payment system; Challenges; Qualitative study; Stakeholder experience; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00564-w Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00564-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13561

DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00564-w

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics Review is currently edited by J. Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

More articles in Health Economics Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().