Examining host-State counterclaims for environmental damage in investor-State dispute settlement from human rights and transnational public policy perspectives

Ted Gleason ()
Additional contact information
Ted Gleason: Grenoble Ecole de Management

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2021, vol. 21, issue 3, No 6, 427-444

Abstract: Abstract In international disputes between investors and host-States, the traditionally asymmetric nature of international investment agreements (IIAs) may prevent States from bringing claims against investors for harm caused, including environmental damage. At the same time, allowing host-State counterclaims for environmental damage is a potentially useful tool for rebalancing the asymmetric nature of IIAs. Yet, in the highly fragmented area of international investment law, the availability of host-State counterclaims is not always clear. This article analyses the procedural and legal bases available for host-State counterclaims for environmental damage, including newly developing human rights and transnational public policy approaches to such claims. The question that this article seeks to evaluate is to what extent host-State counterclaims are available to rebalance the asymmetric relationship between host-States and investors, specifically concerning environmental damage. To answer this question, the article takes a qualitative approach by examining case law, commentary, and the work of international organizations, and applying the results of the research to the specific context of host-State counterclaims for environmental damage. Future developments are also discussed in the context of ongoing multilateral investor-State dispute settlement reform efforts at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. There currently exists a window of opportunity for States to seek cooperative, effective multilateral strategies for partially rebalancing the relationship between investment and the environment. The article posits that harmonization of State approaches towards counterclaims for environmental damage is desirable and States should take a permissive approach towards host-State counterclaims for environmental damage in their IIA treaty negotiation practice.

Keywords: Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS); International investment agreements (IIAs); Counterclaims; Environmental damage; Human rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-020-09519-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:21:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10784-020-09519-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10784

DOI: 10.1007/s10784-020-09519-y

Access Statistics for this article

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics is currently edited by Joyeeta Gupta

More articles in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().