Policy Coherence, Global Environmental Governance, and Poverty Reduction
Tom Jones
Additional contact information
Tom Jones: OECD Environment Directorate
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2002, vol. 2, issue 4, No 6, 389-401
Abstract:
Abstract This paper explores linkages between policy coherence, global environmental governance, and poverty reduction. It begins with a few thoughts on what these terms mean, and how they are linked. It then provides some perspectives on how the linkages might be improved over time. The paper takes the view that the most coherent institutional framework for both poverty reduction and environmental protection is likely to be one that is relatively decentralised, and based on a modular (networking) structure. The implication is that this framework should rely mainly on domestic and regional governance institutions, rather than on global ones. Effective management of environmental problems (both national and international) also implies a judicious mix of strong government institutions, smooth-functioning markets, and well-targeted infrastructure investments. The business and labour communities are therefore crucial. Other elements of civil society, notably the NGOs, also have important roles to play. Global environmental governance will have to overcome significant resistance insofar as the interests of the developing countries are concerned. Developing countries will need to be convinced that it is in their best interest to participate in global environmental institutions. The best way of making this case is to link (local) poverty reduction objectives explicitly to (both local and global) environmental protection goals. Bringing greater coherence to international trade, investment, and development co-operation policies could make an important contribution to strengthening these linkages. Investment is particularly important here – in the future, investment governance will likely prove to be more important for poverty reduction than environmental governance. Focusing on global environmental governance will not be enough.
Keywords: environmental institutions; governance; policy coherence; poverty reduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1021319804455 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:2:y:2002:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1021319804455
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10784
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021319804455
Access Statistics for this article
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics is currently edited by Joyeeta Gupta
More articles in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().