A Bayesian Regression Methodology for Correlating Noisy Hazard and Structural Alert Parameters of Nanomaterials

Eamonn M. McAlea (), Finbarr Murphy and Martin Mullins
Additional contact information
Eamonn M. McAlea: Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick
Finbarr Murphy: Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick
Martin Mullins: Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick

Chapter Chapter 11 in Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, 2016, pp 197-218 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Exposure to ENMs may have associated health risks, but accurate measurement of these risks is difficult due to overwhelming methodological limitations and epistemic uncertainties. This is especially the case for ENM physiochemical and toxicity measurements. A common example of controlling such risks in workplace environments where these materials are produced and used is control banding. It offers a useful framework to categorize health risk but is presently limited by existing quantitative data that is susceptible to ambiguity. With an aim to addressing these issues, this chapter develops a Bayesian regression or QSAR (Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship) model that relates hazard levels (dependent) to physical and chemical attributes (independent) but crucially takes full account of uncertainty in both the dependent and independent data sets. The developed model is applied to recover the marginal probability density distribution of a varied set of physical attribute measurements of cerium oxide nanoparticles that were supplied from a common batch. Each of the measurements in the set was carried out by one of several disparate institutions. It is in the author’s opinion that this model is successful because in principle it is able to exploit and objectively incorporate seemingly conflicting data points to produce meaningful regression fits. This is something that is not possible using conventional regression techniques that typically rely on subjective judgments to resolve such conflicts prior to analysis. The danger of the conventional approach is that potentially useful information, usually interpreted as ‘statistical outliers’, may be disregarded as a result of experimenter bias.

Keywords: Zeta Potential; Maximum Entropy; Reactive Oxygen Species Level; Marginal Distribution; Maximum Entropy Principle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319323923

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().