Balancing Party Autonomy and EU Law in the Member States’ System of Review

Jan Engelmann

Chapter Chapter 2 in International Commercial Arbitration and the Commercial Agency Directive, 2017, pp 19-93 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The interaction of courts with the arbitral process during pre- and post-award review is shaped by the requirement of striking a balance between the goals enshrined in substantive mandatory law and the goal of maintaining arbitration as an effective means of dispute resolution. The former can require courts to limit the autonomy of international arbitration, the latter restricts them in their efforts in this respect. The dichotomy between those two interests becomes complicated where the substantive mandatory provisions have their origins in EU law. Any inquiry into the systems of judicial review needs to take account of this dichotomy—in particular where substantive mandatory EU law intersects with arbitration.

Keywords: National Court; Arbitral Tribunal; Arbitral Award; Arbitration Clause; International Arbitration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:intchp:978-3-319-47449-6_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319474496

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47449-6_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().