Embodied Carbon Footprint Analysis of Prefabricated Buildings Considering Assembly Schemes

Xulu Lai, Clyde Zhengdao Li (), Limei Zhang, Bing Xiao and Vivian W. Y. Tam
Additional contact information
Xulu Lai: Shenzhen University
Clyde Zhengdao Li: Shenzhen University
Limei Zhang: Shenzhen University
Bing Xiao: Western Sydney University
Vivian W. Y. Tam: Western Sydney University

A chapter in Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 2022, pp 463-479 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The construction industry is one of the fields with the largest energy consumption and carbon footprint, and it is also a key and priority field for reducing carbon footprint. Prefabricated buildings have become an effective solution to industrial problems such as labor shortage, low construction efficiency and emission reduction. However, previous studies mostly focused on the energy saving and emission reduction during the operation phase, but paid less attention to the implied carbon footprint, and did not analyze the impact of the assembly scheme on the carbon footprint in combination with the national prefabricated building standards. In this study, the life cycle assessment method (LCA) was used to establish the evaluation framework of the embedded carbon footprint of prefabricated buildings, and a case was selected to verify the calculation. Furthermore, scenario analysis method was applied to explore the impact of assembly rate on carbon footprint under different assembly schemes under the evaluation standards of Prefabricated Building Evaluation Standards (GB/T51129-2017). The results show that the carbon footprint of the embodied stage of the prefabricated building is 463.03 kgCO2e/m2, and the largest proportion is in the production and transportation stage of building materials (95.91%), among which concrete, steel and brick produce more carbon footprints, and the factory production, component transportation and on-site construction and assembly stage related to the construction characteristics of the prefabricated building account for 1.45%. In addition, the carbon footprint increases with the increase of assembly rate, and the environmental burden of material suppliers is gradually transferred to prefabricated component suppliers and logistics providers. However, as the assembly rate continues to increase, the carbon footprint gradually increases slowly. According to the relationship between the assembly rate and the carbon footprint, it can assist the decision-making of the design scheme and the organization and scheduling, so as to reduce the carbon footprint in the embodied stage and improve the construction environment.

Keywords: Embodied carbon footprint; Prefabricated buildings; Carbon reduction; Life cycle assessment; Assembly schemes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-19-5256-2_37

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789811952562

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_37

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Lecture Notes in Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().