Narcissism in CEO research: a review and replication of the archival approach

James R. Scotter ()
Additional contact information
James R. Scotter: University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Management Review Quarterly, 2020, vol. 70, issue 4, No 6, 629-674

Abstract: Abstract Using an unobtrusive archival narcissism measure (Chatterjee and Hambrick in Adm Sci Q 52:351–386, 2007; Adm Sci Q 56:202–237, 2011), CEO narcissism has been linked to important strategic issues: overpayment for acquisitions, risk taking, fraud, etc., but measurement unreliability raises important questions about this research. Six studies (N = 791, comprising 5.3% of CEOs in this review) reported Cronbach’s alphas that met minimum standards (.71 ≤ α ≤ .75) along with other reliability results that were often mixed (e.g. poor test–retest reliability and factor analysis results). However, 37 studies (N = 14,165, 94.7% of CEOs) had unacceptable reliability or failed to report any evidence of reliability at all. Out of 43 studies (total N = 14,956 CEOs), 10 studies (N = 3582) obtained unreported (calculated) Cronbach’s α ≤ .58, 10 studies reported no evidence of reliability or indicator correlations, despite using multiple indicators, and 10 studies justified a measure of narcissism by citing Chatterjee and Hambrick’s (2007) work, but actually relied on only a single archival indicator. Recent studies using the unobtrusive archival approach for CEO narcissism have failed to find acceptable reliability, failed to report low reliability, and have engaged in questionable data transformations. In an operational replication study, data collection procedures were carefully followed, but acceptable results were not obtained in three CEO samples. This article concludes by considering implications for CEO narcissism research and recommendations for future research involving unobtrusive measures.

Keywords: CEO; Narcissism; Unobtrusive; Archival; Replication; Personality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 M10 M19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-019-00178-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:manrev:v:70:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11301-019-00178-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11301

DOI: 10.1007/s11301-019-00178-1

Access Statistics for this article

Management Review Quarterly is currently edited by Thomas Reutterer, Jonas F. Puck, Engelbert Dockner and Anne d'Arcy

More articles in Management Review Quarterly from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().