An automated approach for determination and prioritization of urban potential risk areas within the scope of superstructure
Ersin Aksoy () and
Serdar Selim ()
Additional contact information
Ersin Aksoy: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization
Serdar Selim: Akdeniz University
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2020, vol. 103, issue 1, No 51, 1077-1091
Abstract:
Abstract In the face of natural disasters, it is important to determine the potential risk areas in a fast and high accuracy and to take necessary precaution in urban areas. In this study, the potential risk areas according to the existing legislation are determined and prioritized by using geographic information systems and multi-criteria decision-making analysis. The main aim is to develop an automatic approach for assessing quickly the risk status of superstructure. This study was carried out in the south Mediterranean coast of Turkey in Antalya, which is the fifth largest city in terms of population. The rapid population growth and uncontrolled urbanization were effective in the selection of this region. In addition, the areas where the developed method is applied are dense in terms of slum and non-regulatory structures. As a result, 8.49 ha of the application area was detected to be high risky, 1.22 ha was risky, 9.51 ha was low risky, and 6.24 ha was minimum risk. Hence, the ratio of the areas in the very risky class to the total area is 33%, the ratio of the area in the risky class is 4%, the ratio of the area in the low risk class is 38%, and the rate of the area that appears to be the minimum risk is 25%. In this context, risk classes were mapped and priority intervention areas were determined. This study proposes and applies a method that will help and guide the related management and implementation level, especially urban and regional planners in urban settlements, in determining the potential risk areas due to superstructure.
Keywords: Geographic information systems; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Risk assessment; Spatial planning; Superstructure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04026-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04026-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04026-4
Access Statistics for this article
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk
More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().